I got a response from the author who wrote the article I mentioned here.
Neil….Thanks for your note. I appreciate your points. But you’d be better off directing them to the insurance industry and the traffic-safety guys in Olympia. They’re the experts.
gh
I sent back to him:
No need to thank me, I know I am a pain in the ass, but you and I have two different things to do. I am here to promote scooters and scootering out of a personal belief in that form of transportation for the American city. I truly believe that over the next 10 years the American Urban Landscape will change because of these vehicles and gas prices. (Follow me here, there is a story in it!)
I have to disagree with you about where my points belong. The insurance industry has it right. They have a formula that works, your motorcycle rate is based on: engine displacement, rider age, rider experience (prior accidents?), rider training (have you attended a safety course?). I think this would have been VERY useful to your readers, ad far less alarming. This would display that the 20 year old owner of a Vespa with the $800 quote could get a $400 quote if he were over 30, and a $300 quote if he was riding for 10 years, never had an accident and had taken a safety course. By the same token, that 30 year old could see a $3000 quote for a Ducati 1000cc displacement bike. So in my mind, the industry has it VERY right, I just think you failed to provide the details.
Also, the state traffic-safety guys have it right. I have no doubt they show stats that display a motorcycle being 26 times more dangerous than a car. But that really is of no use when there is such a wide range of safety between a Vespa (which you used as the only example in your article) and a Ducati 1000cc bike. In this case, only using the Vespa, that 26 times more dangerous than a car stat goes out the window. In statistical terms it is the MEAN AVERAGE only. It just doesn’t apply across the board if your aim is to educate people on the real dangers with scooters specifically.
I would be more than happy to provide further information on small displacement motorcycles (which as a category, scooters fall into). I doubt you wish to write another article. Kudos to your paper for writing a separate article here (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/244088_scooter11.html?source=rss) on scooters that was longer, and included more accurate and in depth information.
I am at a loss as to why your assignment desk would have given you that topic when it is already covered in the paper (as well as on your paper’s blog) unless it were meant as a companion piece. But if it was a companion piece then why not be as informative as the other article?
Sorry to take up your time. I will post your response on my blogs, thanks for reading my comments (I really do hope you read them).